Narcissists’ negative perception of their counterpart’s competence and benevolence and their own reduced trust in a negotiation context
نویسنده
چکیده
Despite its important role in interpersonal interactions, narcissism has rarely been examined in the context of negotiations in which individuals cooperate and compete with their counterpart. As negotiations occur frequently in daily life, empirical findings of the role of narcissism in negotiation settings can enhance the understanding of the functions of narcissism in common situations in which selfand other-interests are in conflict. By analyzing 35 negotiation dyads’ within-dyad differences using multilevel analysis, I found that negotiators’ narcissism was negatively related to their perception of their counterpart’s competence but was not significantly related to their individual economic gain (objective negotiation performance), suggesting narcissists’ inflated agentic self or deflated perception of their counterpart’s competence. Additionally, narcissism was negatively related to trust, due to narcissists’ negative perception of their counterpart’s benevolence rather than their counterpart’s competence. These findings contribute to the literatures on narcissism and trust. 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Perceived Organizational Justice as a Predictor of Organizational Trust in Medical Education Organizations
Background and Objectives: Motivated employees are probably the most valuable resource of the contemporary organizations. Evidence shows the significant impact of perceived organizational justice on the attitudes of employees, including their trust. To further investigate the issue in the context of health organizations, this study aimed to explore the relationship between perceived organizatio...
متن کاملNurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks
Executive Overview In many organizations, informal networks are the primary means by which employees find information, solve complex problems, and learn how to do their work. Two forms of interpersonal trust—trust in a person’s competence and in a person’s benevolence— enable effective knowledge creation and sharing in these networks. Yet, though conceptually appealing, trust is an elusive conc...
متن کاملHow do children weigh competence and benevolence when deciding whom to trust?
In three experiments, we investigate how 187 3- to 5-year-olds weigh competence and benevolence when deciding whom to trust. Children were presented with two informants who provided conflicting labels for novel objects--one informant was competent, but mean, the other incompetent, but nice. Across experiments, we manipulated the order in which competence and benevolence were presented and the w...
متن کاملRunning head: DEVELOPING TRUST: FIRST IMPRESSIONS AND EXPERIENCE 1 Developing Trust: First Impressions and Experience
Using the repeated Trust Game, we investigated how first impressions and experience affect trusting dispositions, beliefs, and behaviors. As in previous research, trusting beliefs and trust-related behaviors were greater at the start of the game for partners with trustworthy faces; and higher later in the game for partners who reciprocated. Three additional findings extended beyond the previous...
متن کاملTrust Building in Recommender Agents
Trust has long been regarded as an important factor influencing users’ decision to buy a product in an online shop or to return to the shop for more product information. However, most notions of trust focus on the aspects of benevolence and integrity, and less on competence. Although benefits clearly exist for websites to employ competent recommender agents, the exact nature of these benefits t...
متن کامل